Report cover: The Strike Costs More Than the Raise, by Kelly Emrick

Healthcare leadership dashboard · Labor relations · November 2026

The Strike Costs More Than the Raise

The five steps of union negotiation, and where healthcare leaders lose them. An interactive companion to the investigative report, built to help leaders prepare better, bargain faster and resolve labor disputes before they reach the picket line.

$1B+Kaiser’s reported cost to run facilities through a four-week 2026 strike
64%of workers idled by major 2025 stoppages were in education and health services
409mean days from certification to a first contract; healthcare slowest
5steps, each with a readiness gate the organization must pass

The contradiction this dashboard is built on

Healthcare leaders routinely treat a strike as the price of holding the line on wages. The evidence of 2025 and 2026 says the strike is usually the more expensive line to hold. Kaiser Permanente reported more than $1 billion in strike-period spending and then accepted 21.5 percent anyway. New York City hospitals spent about $100 million on temporary nurses before ratifying three-year contracts. Henry Ford Genesys ran a 411-day strike and then paid a 13 percent catch-up.

The report’s central claim is not that leaders should concede. It is that most healthcare labor disputes are lost in Step 1 and Step 2 of a five-step process, long before anyone argues over a percentage. This dashboard turns that claim into working tools.

A hospital that has met the union 21 times with a mediator present and still faces an open-ended strike has not failed at Step 4. It failed somewhere earlier, and Step 4 is where the bill came due.

How to use this dashboard

  1. The Clock. Enter a contract expiration date and see every statutory notice date under Sections 8(d) and 8(g), plus where you stand today.
  2. The Five Steps. Read what each step is, where healthcare leaders lose it, what good looks like, and what operations must supply.
  3. Readiness Score. Score your organization on 20 criteria to get a Negotiation Readiness Score (0 to 100) and a band.
  4. Continuity Index. Score the strike continuity plan on five elements.
  5. Strike Exposure. Compare the cost of a stoppage you could absorb with the annual cost of the remaining bargaining gap.
  6. Dispute Triage. Describe where a live dispute stands and get a prioritized action list for the next 72 hours.
  7. Contract Scorecard. Track Step 5 contract administration monthly.

Entries are saved in this browser only. Nothing is sent to a server. Use the export buttons to keep a copy.

The season of the picket line

The Bureau of Labor Statistics recorded 30 major work stoppages beginning in 2025, meaning stoppages of 1,000 or more workers lasting at least one shift. That followed 33 in 2023 and 31 in 2024. Education and health services accounted for 196,500 of the 306,800 workers involved in 2025, or 64 percent. Cornell’s Labor Action Tracker, which counts stoppages of any size, logged 57 in health care and social assistance involving 116,826 workers.

Union membership is not surging: the national rate was 10.0 percent in 2025, essentially unchanged. What has changed is the willingness to use the strike. Nurse strikes have roughly quadrupled since 2017, from 5 that year to 21 in 2025, with 19 confirmed by mid-October 2026 and five in a single week in July.

Of 107 confirmed registered nurse walkouts from 2017 through 2026, 48 reached a settled contract and 59 ended with bargaining still open. Among those that reached a contract, roughly nine in ten won staffing improvements. For a union, the strike works. For a hospital, it is a very expensive way to arrive at the contract it was going to sign.

081725337201720201825201982020162021232022332023312024302025
Figure 1. Major work stoppages beginning in the year, 2017 to 2025. The three most recent years are the highest since 2000. Source: BLS Major Work Stoppages in 2025.

Settlements that avoided strikes in 2026

EmployerWhenTerms as reported
Baystate Franklin Medical Center (MA)Oct 202615% over three years, safe-staffing committee, PPO option; averted a 14-day strike
Mount Nittany Medical Center (PA)202614.5% over three years, retroactive to Jan 1, 2026; averted a strike
Mount St. Mary's and Lockport Memorial (NY)June 2026Minimum 12% over the life of the contract
Michigan Nurses Association unitMarch 2026 to Feb 2029Nearly 24% over the life of the agreement
500-nurse unit (Michigan Nurses Association)2026Average increase of more than 18% over three years; maximum more than 27%
Rhode Island Hospital residents (CIR/SEIU)Oct 2026First three-year contract, 95% approval, pay and retirement gains
CGH Medical Center (IL), AFSCMEJuly 2026First contract ratified after five years of negotiations

None of these numbers is small. All of them are smaller than a month of replacement staffing at scale, and all of them came with a signed agreement and a workforce that showed up the next morning.

The arithmetic nobody puts on the same page

Finance teams are precise about the cost of a wage settlement and far less precise about the cost of the alternative. Strike costs are booked as one-time expenses spread across temporary staffing, security, legal, lost volume and management overtime, and are rarely added up next to the settlement they were incurred to avoid. When they are, the comparison is startling.

DisputeWhenScaleDurationReported cost to the employerOutcome
Kaiser Permanente (CA, HI)Jan to Feb 2026~31,000 nurses and professionalsAbout 4 weeksMore than $1 billion in temporary staffing and related costs21.5% across the board over four years; ratified March 2026
Mount Sinai, Montefiore, NewYork-PresbyterianJan to Feb 2026~15,000 nurses4 to 5 weeksAbout $100 million for temporary nurses paid about $9,000 per weekThree-year contracts ratified February 2026
Brigham and Women's HospitalJuly 2026~4,000 nurses1-day strike, 4-day lockoutNot disclosed; replacement contract required five paid daysNo agreement; open-ended strike noticed for November 12
Henry Ford Genesys (MI)2025 to 2026Teamsters Local 332 nurses411 daysNot disclosedRatified Oct 20, 2026: 13% catch-up for below-market wages, staffing protections
Cleveland Clinic Lutheran (OH)Sept to Oct 2026~200 SEIU 1199 workersMore than 2 weeksNot disclosedThree-year contract, wages up nearly 11%, longevity and certification pay
Saint Vincent Hospital (MA)2021 to 2022~800 nurses301 days$5.4 million for the first five days of replacements; about $30,000 per day in police detailsContract ratified January 2022
Providence (OR)2025Multiple facilitiesWeeksEstimated $25 million per week in replacement costsSettled
Kaiser Permanente, 2026$1B ÷ ~31,000 ÷ 4 weeks$8,000Saint Vincent, 2021$5.4M ÷ ~800 ÷ 1 week$6,750New York City, 2026$100M ÷ ~15,000 ÷ 4.5 weeks (temporary nurses only)$1,500
Figure 2. Normalized replacement cost per striking worker per week, author’s calculation from reported figures. Illustrative, not audited. The New York figure covers temporary nurses only.

Why the comparison has to be made honestly

A strike cost is paid once; a raise recurs. Kaiser was careful to make that distinction, and it is fair. The honest comparison is not strike cost against the entire raise but strike cost against the gap between the parties’ last positions. In the Brigham dispute the entire union wage request is about $128 million over 18 months by the hospital’s estimate, roughly $7 million per month. Apply the per-worker range in Figure 2 to 4,000 striking nurses and one week on the picket line costs between $6 million and $32 million before a single elective procedure is cancelled.

The Strike Exposure tab turns this into a calculator for any organization.

The healthcare bargaining clock

Healthcare is the only private industry with its own chapter of the National Labor Relations Act. The 1974 Health Care Amendments imposed notice requirements that exist nowhere else. Enter a contract expiration date to see every statutory date and where today falls.

Enter a date to see the Day -90, Day -60 and Day -10 milestones and the days remaining from today.

Section 8(d): the duty to bargain and the long notices

A party that wants to end or change a contract must give the other party written notice 90 days before expiration in healthcare (60 elsewhere) and notify FMCS and the state mediation agency 60 days before expiration (30 elsewhere). FMCS requires the notices in writing and may mediate. When a healthcare union is bargaining a first contract, it must notify FMCS within 30 days of the existence of a dispute. A healthcare employer always has at least two months of federally supervised runway before a contract can lawfully expire; a well-run organization treats it as the second half of its preparation window.

Section 8(g): the ten-day strike notice

A labor organization must give at least ten days’ written notice to the institution and to FMCS before any strike, picketing or concerted refusal to work, stating the date and time. A strike begun without valid notice is unprotected, and employees who join it can lose their status as employees under the Act. The requirement runs to the union, not to individuals, so an employer may ask employees whether they intend to report during a noticed strike and may plan patient coverage on the answers.

The Board regained its quorum on January 7, 2026 and a 3-1 majority on August 7, 2026. Charges filed during a dispute will now be decided. This tool is informational and is not legal advice; confirm every date with labor counsel.

The five steps, and where healthcare leaders lose them

Collective bargaining follows a sequence any labor relations text describes in the same five steps. What this dashboard adds is the healthcare-specific account of how each step fails, the readiness gate before the next, and what system operations must supply. Select a step.

1

Step 1. Prepare

The step that decides the other four

What the step is

Preparation assembles everything the organization will need at the table and everything it will need if the table fails. It begins six to twelve months before expiration, well before the 90-day notice, and produces five things: a complete internal data picture, a costed set of positions with a mandate from governance, a bargaining team with a single spokesperson, an honest anticipation of the union's proposals, and a tested operations continuity plan.

Where healthcare leaders lose it

  • Bargaining from a budget envelope instead of the labor market, so the hospital defends a number it cannot explain against a number the union can.
  • A continuity plan that exists on paper. A hospital that must contract replacements for five days to run a one-day strike has told the union exactly how expensive its tolerance is.
  • No mandate. A team that returns to the C-suite for every move is slower than the union, and the union notices.

What good looks like

  • Wage position by job code against the three nearest competitors and the state's last three union settlements.
  • Turnover, vacancy, agency spend, overtime and mandatory overtime by unit for 36 months; staffing against any statutory ratio; grievance and ULP history; engagement cut by bargaining unit.
  • Every position costed over the full term with compounding, and a documented rationale that could be said aloud at the table.
  • A written mandate from governance defining the walk-away point and the authority delegated to the chief spokesperson.

System operations support

The COO's office owns the continuity plan, and the plan must be exercised, not filed. Service line leaders model the volume and margin effect of a ten-day and thirty-day stoppage; supply chain confirms agency agreements and their minimum-day obligations; patient access models diversion and rescheduling; security and facilities plan the perimeter.

Operations owner: COO, CFO, CNO, service line leaders

Readiness gate. Score this step on the Readiness Score tab. A step below 10 of 20 is a step the organization has skipped, not a step it argued badly.
2

Step 2. Set the ground rules

The step that gets skipped

What the step is

Before proposals are exchanged, the parties agree on how bargaining will be conducted: a schedule of dates, location and cost sharing, the chief spokesperson on each side, how information requests will be handled and on what timeline, how tentative agreements on individual articles will be initialed, and what each side will and will not say publicly while bargaining continues.

Where healthcare leaders lose it

  • Ground rules disposed of in twenty minutes, with the omissions surfacing months later as process disputes.
  • No information-request protocol. Late or incomplete responses hand the union a ready-made unfair labor practice charge, and a ULP strike carries protections an economic strike does not.
  • No communications rule, so bargaining becomes a public campaign and the room becomes a place to perform.

What good looks like

  • A written ground rules agreement signed before the first substantive session.
  • Dates booked through and beyond expiration, including the 60-day FMCS window.
  • A specified turnaround for information requests, honored every time.
  • Agreement that non-economic articles come first and that tentative agreements are initialed and not reopened.
  • A chief spokesperson who is not the chief executive, and one voice at the table.

System operations support

Operations provides the information-request engine. A system that can produce a staffing grid, an overtime log, or an agency invoice summary within days will never be accused of bad-faith delay, and the same data infrastructure is the one the organization should be running for its own management.

Operations owner: Labor relations, HR analytics, IT

Readiness gate. Score this step on the Readiness Score tab. A step below 10 of 20 is a step the organization has skipped, not a step it argued badly.
3

Step 3. Exchange proposals

The step that reveals interests

What the step is

Each side presents its proposals, typically in full written form. Proposals are explained, questions are asked, and both sides begin to separate positions from the interests behind them. This is the first point at which the organization's preparation is tested publicly: a costed, rationalized counterproposal reads very differently from a page of strikeouts.

Where healthcare leaders lose it

  • The thin opening: current language plus a wage line, which signals the organization has not thought about what it wants and invites the union to set the entire agenda.
  • The surprise opening: a long list of takeaways, often on health benefits, that converts a wage negotiation into a trust negotiation. Health insurance cost shifting is the most reliable way to turn a settleable dispute into a strike.
  • Hearing positions rather than interests. A ratio demand is about control over assignment and fatigue; a weekend differential is about predictability; a metal detector is about whether leadership believes the violence is real.

What good looks like

  • A full written employer proposal that includes what the organization affirmatively wants: scheduling flexibility, float and cross-training language, a staffing committee with an escalation path, and a wage structure that solves known compression.
  • Non-economic articles first, so trust is built on items that cost nothing.
  • Every economic proposal costed in writing and shared, so the union argues with the math rather than the motive.
  • An interest map maintained and updated after every session.

System operations support

Operations is the source of the affirmative proposals. The flexibility the organization wants, the float pools it needs, the acuity tool it would rather use than a fixed ratio, the overtime it wants to eliminate: these are operations priorities that labor relations translates into contract language.

Operations owner: CNO, staffing office, operations leaders

Readiness gate. Score this step on the Readiness Score tab. A step below 10 of 20 is a step the organization has skipped, not a step it argued badly.
4

Step 4. Bargain and problem-solve

The step everyone thinks is the whole process

What the step is

The parties move through proposals systematically, trading, packaging and narrowing. Tentative agreements accumulate article by article. Mediation may be requested by either side or offered by FMCS after the 60-day notice. A lawful impasse allows an employer to implement its last, best and final offer on mandatory subjects, but impasse is a legal conclusion the Board will scrutinize, and declaring it prematurely converts an economic strike into a protected ULP strike.

Where healthcare leaders lose it

  • The premature final offer, tabled before the membership has absorbed what the alternative looks like, and therefore voted down.
  • Costing that cannot keep pace with a union that packages four items and wants an answer by the next session.
  • Misreading the strike vote. A 93 percent authorization is not a bluff; it is a signal that the membership has concluded leadership is not listening.
  • The lockout reflex. A lockout the workforce experiences as retaliation is cited in every subsequent union statement.

What good looks like

  • A finance analyst at the table and a model that prices any package in minutes.
  • Packaging rather than item-by-item trading, so affirmative priorities travel with concessions.
  • Early, voluntary FMCS mediation, which costs nothing and changes the dynamics of a public dispute.
  • A pre-agreed internal trigger for the final offer, tied to the calendar and the continuity plan rather than to frustration.
  • Treating the ten-day notice as a planning window: execute the continuity plan and keep bargaining, because most noticed strikes are averted in the last 72 hours.

System operations support

The continuity plan is activated at the notice, not at the strike: replacement contracts executed, elective volume rescheduled in a defined sequence, diversion criteria communicated to EMS, daily incident command begun. Operations reports the running cost to the bargaining team every day so the Strike Exposure Ratio is a live number at the table.

Operations owner: Incident command, finance analyst at the table

Readiness gate. Score this step on the Readiness Score tab. A step below 10 of 20 is a step the organization has skipped, not a step it argued badly.
5

Step 5. Settle and implement

The step that determines the next negotiation

What the step is

The parties reach a tentative agreement, the union's committee recommends it, the membership votes, the contract is signed, and the terms take effect on ratification. Then the real work begins: wage tables loaded, retroactive pay calculated, scheduling rules implemented, joint committees seated, managers trained. Contract administration is where the next negotiation is already being shaped.

Where healthcare leaders lose it

  • Ratification treated as the finish line, and the organization disperses.
  • The joint staffing committee meets twice and lapses; managers are never trained; the grievance log fills with avoidable interpretation disputes.
  • Retroactive pay arrives late and the first paycheck after ratification becomes a reason for distrust.
  • The Step 1 data is not maintained, so the next cycle begins again from zero.

What good looks like

  • A ratification-to-implementation plan with named owners and dates for every article that changes practice.
  • A joint labor-management structure that meets on a calendar and publishes what it decides.
  • A grievance dashboard by article reviewed monthly by the executive team.
  • A standing labor relations data function that keeps the Step 1 picture current year-round.
  • A retrospective within sixty days of ratification that scores the organization's own readiness at each step.

System operations support

Operations owns implementation: scheduling systems reconfigured, differentials coded, float rules built into the staffing office's practice, and the staffing committee staffed by leaders with authority to act. The executive scorecard is an operations scorecard: vacancy, agency spend, overtime, grievances and engagement by unit, trended against the contract's own commitments.

Operations owner: Operations, payroll, scheduling, labor-management committee

Readiness gate. Score this step on the Readiness Score tab. A step below 10 of 20 is a step the organization has skipped, not a step it argued badly.

Negotiation Readiness Score

Score each criterion from 0 to 5 using the anchors. Each step contributes up to 20 points; the total is the Negotiation Readiness Score (0 to 100). The score is not a prediction of the outcome. It measures how much of the outcome the organization controls.

0NRS
Not yet scored
Step 1. Prepare0 / 20
Step 2. Set the ground rules0 / 20
Step 3. Exchange proposals0 / 20
Step 4. Bargain and problem-solve0 / 20
Step 5. Settle and implement0 / 20
Step 1. Prepare
Market data: wage position by job code against nearest competitors and the last three regional settlements0: Budget target only   5: Complete, current within 90 days, shared with governance
Mandate: documented walk-away point and delegated authority to the chief spokesperson0: Team returns to the C-suite for every move   5: Written mandate approved before the 90-day notice
Continuity plan: tested, with a known cost for a ten-day stoppage0: Exists on paper or not at all   5: Exercised within 12 months; cost modeled by service line
Team: single chief spokesperson, finance analyst, operations and nursing leaders, counsel in support0: Counsel leads; executives rotate   5: Stable team, trained together, roles assigned
Step 2. Set the ground rules
Written, signed ground rules before the first substantive session0: None   5: Signed, including communications and patient care contingencies
Bargaining calendar booked through and beyond expiration0: Dates set session by session   5: Full calendar, including the 60-day FMCS window
Information-request protocol with a defined turnaround0: Ad hoc responses   5: Protocol in writing; all requests answered inside the turnaround
Communications discipline: one voice at the table, agreed external posture0: Public statements drive the process   5: Joint or restrained communications agreement honored
Step 3. Exchange proposals
Full written employer proposal with affirmative operational asks0: Current language plus a wage line   5: Complete proposal including scheduling, float and staffing structure
Every economic item costed over the term, in writing0: Uncosted   5: Costed, compounded and shared
Non-economic articles sequenced first0: Wages first   5: Non-economic tentative agreements reached before economics open
Interests behind the union's positions documented and discussed internally0: Positions only   5: Interest map maintained and updated each session
Step 4. Bargain and problem-solve
Real-time costing capacity at the table0: Overnight or longer   5: Any package priced within the session
FMCS mediation engaged voluntarily before the 60-day notice forces it0: Resisted   5: Engaged early
Final-offer trigger pre-agreed and tied to calendar and continuity plan0: Final offer tabled on frustration   5: Trigger documented and followed
Continuity plan activated at the 8(g) notice with daily cost reporting to the bargaining team0: Activated at the strike   5: Activated at notice; SER live at the table
Step 5. Settle and implement
Implementation plan with named owners and dates for every changed article0: None   5: Plan complete at ratification
Joint labor-management and staffing committees seated and meeting on a calendar0: Lapsed   5: Meeting, publishing decisions
Grievance dashboard by article reviewed monthly by executives0: Grievances handled case by case   5: Trended and reviewed
Retrospective scoring the organization's readiness completed within 60 days0: None   5: Completed; next cycle's Step 1 begun

Interpreting the score

80 to 100: Prepared. The organization controls its own sequence. Strikes at this level are rare and short, and settlements fall inside the mandate.
60 to 79: Exposed. The organization will likely settle, but late and at a price set by the union’s calendar rather than its own.
40 to 59: Reactive. Bargaining from a budget number without a tested continuity plan. A strike authorization vote at this level is a 90-day warning.
Below 40: Vulnerable. Any strike will cost more than the settlement, and the organization will know it only afterward. Assume the union has already modeled this.

The bands are the author’s constructs and have not been validated against outcomes. Use them as a structured conversation, not a verdict.

Operations Continuity Index

The continuity plan is scored separately on five elements, each worth 20 points. An organization that scores below 60 should not table a final offer, because it cannot afford the answer. Move each slider to the level that describes the plan as it exists today, not as it is intended.

0OCI
Not yet scored

Score all five elements to see the verdict.

Service decisionsA service-by-service decision on continue, curtail or divert, with the revenue and margin effect of each.
0 / 20
Replacement agreementsExecuted replacement staffing agreements with minimum-day obligations understood and costed.
0 / 20
Credentialing pathwayA credentialing and orientation pathway that can bring replacement clinicians to the floor inside the ten-day window.
0 / 20
Incident commandAn incident command structure with named leaders for every unit on day one.
0 / 20
Communications planA communications plan for patients, referring physicians, emergency medical services and regulators.
0 / 20
0: does not exist5: drafted10: assigned and resourced15: exercised once20: exercised in the last 12 months, costed by service line

Strike Exposure Ratio

The Strike Exposure Ratio compares the expected cost of a work stoppage of the duration the organization is realistically prepared to absorb with the annualized cost of the gap between the parties’ last positions. An SER above 1.0 means a single year of closing the gap costs less than the strike being contemplated to avoid it. A high SER is not an argument for conceding; it is a signal that leverage lies in the continuity plan, not in waiting.

The stoppage
The gap

Defaults are illustrative and loosely modeled on the public Brigham figures (about 4,000 nurses, a union request of 3 and 4 percent against no across-the-board offer). Replace them with your own.

$0Expected stoppage cost
$0Annual cost of the remaining gap
0.0Strike Exposure Ratio
0Weeks of stoppage that equal one year of the gap

Figure 3. Cumulative stoppage cost by week against one year of the remaining gap. Author’s model; all inputs are the user’s assumptions.

Dispute triage: the next 72 hours

Describe where a live dispute stands. The triage engine applies the report’s five-step logic and the statutory clock to produce a prioritized action list. It does not replace counsel; it tells the leadership team which step it is actually in and what that step requires before the next move.

Set the selectors and build the list.

Step 5 contract scorecard

A contract that is kept visibly is a contract that will be renewed without a strike. Enter this month’s figures and the contract’s commitments; the scorecard trends each measure and flags the ones drifting toward the next dispute. Grievance volume by article is the best early indicator of what the next contract fight will be about.

No months saved yet.

Ten questions a chief executive should be able to answer today

Mark each question the leadership team can answer now, with evidence, not with a plan to find out. Fewer than seven is a Step 1 problem.

0 of 10 answered

Sources, method and limits

This dashboard accompanies the investigative report “The Strike Costs More Than the Raise” (Kelly Emrick, November 2026). Strike cost figures are as reported by employers or the press and are not audited; per-worker normalizations are the author’s calculations and are illustrative. The five-step sequence is standard collective bargaining practice. The readiness gates, the Negotiation Readiness Score, the Operations Continuity Index and the Strike Exposure Ratio are the author’s constructs and have not been validated against outcomes. Nothing here is legal advice.

  1. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Major Work Stoppages in 2025 (USDL-26-0232), February 20, 2026; Union Members 2025, February 18, 2026.
  2. Cornell University ILR School. Labor Action Tracker Annual Report 2025.
  3. National Labor Relations Board. Collective bargaining (Section 8(d) and 8(b)(3)); Satellite Healthcare, 374 NLRB No. 25 (January 15, 2026); FY 2026 case processing statement.
  4. Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service. Collective bargaining mediation and notice requirements; Federal Register notices on the Section 8(g) notification form (2025).
  5. Beverly Health and Rehabilitation Services v. NLRB, 317 F.3d 316 (4th Cir. 2003); SEIU v. NLRB (9th Cir. 2009).
  6. Hunton Andrews Kurth, Honigman, Morgan Lewis, Butler Snow, Troutman Pepper Locke, Franczek and Proskauer client alerts on the NLRB quorum and majority, December 2025 to September 2026.
  7. Becker's Hospital Review. 21 healthcare strikes in 2026; 55 hospitals, health systems raising workers' pay; Kaiser prices 2026 healthcare workers strike at $1B; 2025 ushers new era in physician unions.
  8. Nurse.org. 2026 Nurse Strikes list; Nurse strikes have quadrupled since 2017; Do nurse strikes actually work?; Brigham nurses set open-ended strike for November 12.
  9. Boston Globe, July 7 and October 21, 2026; CBS Boston, November 1, 2026; ABC News, January 26, 2026; Ideastream Public Media, October 9, 2026; Health Exec, June 29, 2026.
  10. AFSCME, July 22, 2026; Committee of Interns and Residents/SEIU press releases, 2026; Labor Relations Institute, August 4, 2026.
  11. Bloomberg Law. Analysis: How long does it take unions to reach first contracts? (Robert Combs).
  12. American Nurses Association. Staffing Legislation Landscape Report; Health Affairs, Hospital nurse staffing legislation (2024); Oregon Revised Statutes 441.760 to 441.795.

© 2026 Kelly Emrick, DHSc, PhD, MBA, BSRT(ARRT)R. Free to share with attribution. Part of the free resource ecosystem for healthcare leaders at kellyemrick.com, kellyemrick.org and kellyemrick.blog.

The Strike Costs More Than the Raise · Kelly Emrick · November 2026Browser storage

The Emrick Labor Readiness Model

Homekellyemrick.com